Small and Mid-sized Firms can Bolster Client Relationships by Tailoring Feesby Joel A. Rose
More privately and publicly owned businesses are shopping around to retain high quality attorneys in smaller and mid-sized law firms to perform "commodity" and "routine" legal work as an alternative to referring legal work to more expensive larger law firms.
Privately owned businesses, with and without in-house counsel, and publicly owned corporations, have legal matters that are repetitive in nature or largely standardized that can be performed by smaller and mid-sized law firms that can be billed using variations on hourly rate billing and alternative billing methods.
Many small and mid-sized firms offer financial and non-financial incentives to build their relationships with existing clients and to foster new relationships with potential clients. Examples of incentives offered to existing clients include a day at the client's business location without charge to learn about the nature of the client's business; sharing firm form agreement files with staff attorneys without charge; presentations on current legal trends to business staff where appropriate; and training for members of the in-house legal staff when presentations are being offered to law firm personnel.
Where the firm is "betting" on future engagements, incentives offered selectively to potential clients may include free services or discounted services at the present time with the expectation that full-rate services will be provided at a later date; attendance at corporate meetings without charge in return for future representation when the company or a new subsidiary organization is formed.
REPRESENTATIVE BILLING ARRANGEMENTS
Three variations of hourly billing include percentage discounts, reduced hourly rates and blended hourly rates.
To implement the above variations of hourly rates and to maintain or increase the level of profitability, lawyer management must analyze the organization and management of each of its practice areas to ensure that quality legal services will be provided in a timely, efficient and cost-effective manner. To accomplish this, partners must select which clients and practice areas to make available for alternative billing arrangements and to invest their time to manage each practice area. Attorneys, paralegals and administrative personnel must be trained and substantive practice areas systematized and automated to the extent possible.
Fixed Fee Billing
Under the fixed fee arrangement the law firm and the client agree upon the fees to be paid for all of a client's work or all of a client's work in a particular practice area or for particular elements or tasks, or for various phases of work. Fixed fees are frequently determined for specific discrete repetitive jobs where what is being done and the time it will take to perform this work is reasonably predictable from historical experience.
Clients prefer this arrangement because their total legal fee for this work is certain. It is easy to budget in advance. Legal costs may be reduced if the fixed fee is less than the historical cost paid by the client for similar legal services. The risk of unexpected or unanticipated events in whole or in part and the burden of managing the work for efficiency and cost containment is shifted from the client to the law firm. Further, the fixed-fee arrangement assures involvement of input by the client in projecting the cost of legal fees for services to be rendered and in determining what will be the strategic performance choices and when they will be carried out.
The above advantages notwithstanding, a fixed fee arrangement may limit for the client the choice of law firms willing to represent that client. This is especially true in a "seller's market" or on a legal market having considerable uncertainty. Also, setting of a fee-cap may result in the unwillingness of a law firm to undertake marginally unprofitable work that may be important in achieving the result desired by the client. Corner cutting can be avoided by a reopener provision that encourages a law firm to identify, discuss and then pursue additional work with the client's approval.
Fixed-fee billing, properly structured, offers many advantages to the law firm.
The fixed-fee arrangement requires a specific and detailed definition of the work to be performed and a careful estimate of the hours needed to complete the job under this arrangement. Firms that enter into this arrangement must be careful about what is excluded from the contract and what is included. Considerable thought must be given to determine how "extras" will be billed.
UNIT PRICE BILLING
Unit pricing, a variation of the fixed-fee arrangement, is usually determined for various tasks or phases of a matter, with payment being made upon the successful completion of the agreed upon task or phase. Payment for each is usually a set amount, regardless of how long it takes to complete.
'Capped Fee' Billing
A "capped fee" is a modified form of a fixed fee. Under this arrangement, the client and the law firm agree that the fees to perform specific work will not exceed a certain dollar figure. The firm may charge its standard hourly rates, however, beyond a certain maximum limit, the client will not pay more money.
Contingent arrangement is when the law firm is paid upon results achieved. This arrangement is usually in combination with some other billing arrangement. Examples are reduced hourly rates with a bonus based upon results achieved or standard hourly rates charged up to a specified time/dollar value and a contingency arrangement thereafter that dollar value has been reached.
IS YOUR FIRM READY?
The type of legal work performed for your clients, the nature of your client base, the competitive environment in which your firm practices and the client's perception of the value of the legal work performed will be critical factors in determining whether your firm should volunteer or react to external pressures for alternative billing arrangements from your clients or as the result of competitive pressures created by other law firms.
Your partners' responses to the following questions will offer valuable insight about the firm's willingness and ability to "accept and live with" one or more types of alternative billing arrangements.
If your partners' responses to most of the above questions are of a positive nature and if consensus is reached among the partners to implement one or more alternative billing arrangements, the following should be considered to develop appropriate strategies for selecting and managing the most appropriate arrangements that will be satisfactory for the firm and its clients.
Making the changes necessary to successfully implement an alternative billing system as a replacement for an hourly rate billing system will involve and likely will require significant changes in other systems including your evaluation, compensation, training and the practice/work management systems.
Test the tentative arrangement with your client and revise your plans based upon tests.
Variations of hourly billings, fixed fee billing, contingent fee arrangements and other forms of "alternative billing" are no longer merely isolated experiences. They are becoming increasingly more commonplace. An alternative billing system cannot succeed unless there is built in flexibility to deal with unanticipated or extraordinary events. You will have to work harder to keep making what you are now earning unless you begin to work smarter and take advantage of the opportunities inherent in at least some types of alternative billing.
©1999-2017 Joel A. Rose & Associates