SYMPTOMS OF POOR MANAGEMENTby Joel A. Rose
Many attorneys seem to take comfort in the notion that like the legendary shoemaker, they are too busy with client affairs to look after their own administrative and financial matters. The primary cause of many of their problems is related directly to their own doing. Many attorneys, highly trained and skilled in substantive areas of law, regard their prime mission in life to be of service to their clients. When this attitude is coupled with the belief that firm administration is a "necessary evil," the situation oftentimes leads to the negligence of the business affairs of their law firms.
Attorneys join firms to achieve benefits which would not be possible if they were to practice on their own. These benefits include the opportunity to consult with one's partners, to acquire a diversity of skills, to take advantage of the accumulated experience and reputation of a firm, to attract larger and more prestigious and profitable clients, to benefit from the economy of size through more efficient and effective management practices, systems and services, etc.
These advantages have contributed significantly to the dramatic increase in the number and size of general practice and specialty law firms in recent years. From the point of view of an attorney in a smaller firm growth generally is considered desirable. However, growth does pose problems in the management of individual lawyers, facilities and resources.
Attorneys in smaller law firms can keep well informed about their firm's activities by personal observations and involvement. However, once a group of lawyers reach a certain size, some formalization of the management processes must be imposed to ensure adequate control over all of the firm's affairs.
Symptoms of the Need for Better Management
In growing law firms vague and ambiguous economic and practice objectives are oftentimes indicative of an absence of direction towards results that are compatible with the personal, professional and economic objectives of their partners. Every law firm that expects to have a profitable practice must identify objectives. These objectives should be formulated and expressed in terms of revenue, firm-size, management structure, type of practice, etc. An important reason for defining objectives is to ensure that maximum effectiveness can be achieved in the day-to-day operations of the firm.
Adequate control over the utilization of professional personnel is fundamental for a law firm to be profitable. The success that a firm will have in providing quality legal services in an effective and timely manner will be in direct proportion to the firm's ability to manage and control its lawyer personnel.
The extent to which lawyers may be utilized most effectively, i.e., working in certain substantive practice areas as opposed to others, training of associates, managing the firm and substantive practice areas, etc. depend on the willingness of the members of the firm to subordinate their personal and professional goals for the benefit of the organization. Unless lawyers perceive that firm management possesses the perquisite skills to manage effectively, there will be little or no organization.
Control of overhead in growing law firms is particularly important because many overhead and administrative support costs tend to grow disproportionately to professional activity. Accordingly, firm management must be watchful about the persistent increase of unreasonable overhead that may drain away profit.
Overhead costs are usually the most complained about but frequently the most neglected from the standpoint of management control. Overhead tends to increase more rapidly and to decrease more slowly than the level of professional activities which they support. Regardless of the size of the law office, overhead should be controlled by means of a budget for each type of expense, i.e., nonlawyer employment costs, occupancy costs, other direct and indirect costs, etc. This budget, established as part of an annual financial plan, should represent the total expense required to support the expected level of revenue producing activities.
The impact of management control on cash flow is most crucial in the areas of billing, collections and utilization of lawyer personnel. Payments for administrative and associate personnel, rent, and other overhead items are relatively easy to anticipate. However, the timing and the amount of cash revenue, especially in firms with a high proportion of transactional type matters, must be well controlled, starting at the point where lawyers accept client work. Every hour of billable client work creates an opportunity to receive income in the future. Three points are important in this connection. The first is the necessity of arriving at a clear understanding by the firm with each lawyer to produce revenue that exceeds their salary or draw, direct and indirect overhead and some provision for retirement. The second is the need of communicating to and obtaining from clients their agreement about the amount to be billed and the timing of billings for fees and disbursements. This understanding should be reached at the time of acceptance of a client matter and confirmed in writing. The third point is that the revenue derived from the representation should be measured against a standard, mainly the time/dollar value of the work performed which represents the number of hours devoted by the lawyer multiplied by the assigned hourly rates. This standard is recommended because the assigned hourly rate should be based upon the number of billable hours to be worked, overhead, profit and/or retirement.
Any client billing not equal to or less than time/dollar value by some agreed upon dollar amount or percentage involves a write-down which, by firm policy, should be approved by some partner other than the billing partner. Because of the myriad reasons for write-downs, i.e., less favorable results, training time, underestimating the fee, etc. a distinction should be made in the management reporting of each.
The billing process should include the systematic review of unbilled time and accounts receivable. Unless a systematized procedure has been designed and implemented to ensure adequate control over billings and collections, cash flow will suffer.
Many lawyers are less proficient in managing their own firms than they are in serving their clients because of the organizational nature of the partnership form of business. Law firms, organized as partnerships or structured as professional corporations that function as partnerships, may enjoy financial success and growth because of the close association between the client and one or more of the partners who bind the firm to that client. Although the partnership type of organization may be effective for maintaining client relationships, it frequently fails to clarify the differences between the equity position of attorneys and the organizational structure and management obligations of partners. For this reason, a relatively loose organization involving a purely democratic relationship is oftentimes unsatisfactory for handling many of the firm's internal affairs and for assuring the desired profitability and growth. The need to make distinctions among ownership, management and professional practice, become readily apparent as a firm increases in size. Generally, there are two types of rights and responsibilities involved in a partnership form of organization. The first are those arising from the partnership agreement, which, are proprietary in nature. The second are those arising from the method of firm governance which includes functional responsibilities of certain partners for managing the day-to-day and long-range planning activities and substantive areas of practice.
Good management practices in a law firm cannot be achieved unless the privileges, obligations and responsibilities of partners are established and agreed upon. Effective management begins with organization. Organization for a law firm begins with the identification of a managing partner who may function as a chief executive officer, an executive committee that functions in a manner similar to a Board of Directors, or a more representative committee system that receives direction from the managing partner or the executive committee.
©1999-2015 Joel A. Rose & Associates